Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 2/6 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 2/6 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/6 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/6 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 2/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.38
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.17
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
4.13
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.44
4.75
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.50
5.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
4.63
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong curriculum and diverse, recognized programs
  • +Efficient support services and professional growth opportunities
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Across multiple aspects, this institution receives commendations. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. The university also performs exceptionally well in professors, location, and accommodation. On the other hand, its weakest area is internationality, which, while still solid, is rated lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a particularly strong showing in student engagement and academic resources.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With an average rating of 4.88/5 from 8 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and transformative learning experiences. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

Nothing to show

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
88%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
4★
44%
13%
50%
0%
29%
100%
0%
3★
33%
0%
50%
0%
29%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close