Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC (4.70)
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/6 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 1/6 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/6 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 3/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
3.00
Not rated
4.20
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
3.40
3.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.17
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.20
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.44
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.00
Not rated
4.40
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
4.00
Not rated
3.60
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.

Nothing to show

  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

Nothing to show

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
25%
0%
83%
43%
0%
0%
4★
44%
75%
0%
0%
29%
100%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
17%
29%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close