Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD vs Fundación Universidad de América
Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
- +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
- +Strong career support and personal development
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
- +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
- +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.
- +Supportive and high-quality teaching
- +Ample green campus spaces
- +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
- +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
- +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
- -Poor administrative and management practices.
- -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
Nothing to show
This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.
Nothing to show
About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
Nothing to show
Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university offers 100% online education programs, which allows people like me who for some reason must stay home. However, I believe there is little support, no virtual classes, and in most cases, students must do everything alone.
Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show