Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB (4.50)
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 1/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 2/7 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.20
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.44
Win
3.80
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.40
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
2.20
Not rated
4.25
Win
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive learning environment and quality programs
  • +Welcoming and student-friendly atmosphere
  • +Financial accessibility and athletic opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently a source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** (4.5) and strong scores for **Professors** (4.25) and **Value** (4.25), suggesting a positive learning environment and good return on investment. **Accommodation** also receives a high rating (4.25). The weakest area, **Internationality**, with a score of 3, indicates room for improvement in global engagement. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated well at 4.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are highly positive, highlighting supportive staff and a great learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
54%
0%
33%
0%
33%
0%
4★
44%
38%
0%
33%
0%
67%
0%
3★
33%
8%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close