Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP
Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
- +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
- +Strong career support and personal development
- +High quality programs and professional teachers
- +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +Valued student talent and supportive development.
- +High-quality faculty and effective teaching methods.
- +Efficient problem resolution and excellent curriculum.
Nothing to show
- +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
- +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
- +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
Exhibiting generally positive feedback, the university scores highest in Student Life, closely followed by Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving excellent marks. Facilities also perform well. Its weakest area, however, is Internationality, though still receiving a solid rating. Value for money is also highly regarded.
Nothing to show
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.
Nothing to show
About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, and support for talent development. Some mention campus layout as a minor point.
Nothing to show
All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show