Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Centro Colombo Americano

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Antonio Nariño (5.00)
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 0/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.74
Win
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.56
4.56
4.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
4.68
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.33
4.42
Win
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.44
4.63
Win
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.22
4.47
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
3.89
4.37
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
11%
85%
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
44%
7%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
7%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close