Universidad El Bosque vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad El Bosque: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
4.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.71
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.57
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.40
Not rated
Internationality
3.47
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
  • +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
  • +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
0%
100%
100%
80%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close