Universidad El Bosque vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB (5.00)
Universidad El Bosque: wins 1/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 1/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.82
4.74
4.38
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.71
Win
4.56
4.63
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.68
Win
4.63
4.00
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.47
4.42
4.13
5.00
Win
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.63
4.75
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.10
4.47
4.50
2.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.60
4.37
4.63
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong curriculum and diverse, recognized programs
  • +Efficient support services and professional growth opportunities
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

Across multiple aspects, this institution receives commendations. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. The university also performs exceptionally well in professors, location, and accommodation. On the other hand, its weakest area is internationality, which, while still solid, is rated lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a particularly strong showing in student engagement and academic resources.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With an average rating of 4.88/5 from 8 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and transformative learning experiences. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
85%
88%
100%
56%
0%
0%
4★
25%
7%
13%
0%
44%
0%
0%
3★
13%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close