Universidad El Bosque vs Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad El Bosque (4.50)
Universidad El Bosque: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 1/7 categories
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 3/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Bogota, Colombia
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.83
Win
4.11
Not rated
4.20
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.71
4.56
Not rated
4.80
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.43
4.33
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.44
Win
Not rated
4.40
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.14
4.22
Not rated
4.60
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
3.89
Not rated
4.25
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development

Nothing to show

  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
11%
0%
40%
40%
0%
0%
4★
25%
44%
0%
40%
60%
100%
0%
3★
13%
33%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close