Universidad El Bosque vs Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP

Side-by-side comparison from 99 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ (4.80)
Universidad El Bosque: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 0/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES: wins 1/7 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 1/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.83
Win
4.11
4.74
4.69
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
Location
4.71
Win
4.56
4.56
4.17
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.00
4.68
Win
4.52
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.43
4.33
4.42
4.43
Win
Not rated
2.71
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.44
4.63
Win
4.31
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.14
4.22
4.47
4.33
Not rated
4.57
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
3.89
4.37
Win
4.05
Not rated
3.20
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Rigorous, deep, and innovative academic programs with opportunities for interdisciplinary study.
  • +Inspiring and experienced international faculty offering precise and relevant learning.
  • +Stimulating learning environments with extensive campus facilities and a strong sense of community.

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of academic support.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

This institution receives high marks overall, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.69. Professors are also highly rated (4.52), alongside a strong showing for Internationality (4.43) and Value (4.33). Student Life scores well at 4.31. The weakest, though still solid, areas are Location (4.17) and Accomodation (4.05).

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With 46 out of 47 reviews being positive, students praise enriching academic opportunities like double majors and innovative teaching methods such as PBL. The university is lauded as number one in Colombia for its rigorous structure and comprehensive curriculum.

Nothing to show

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
11%
85%
64%
0%
38%
0%
4★
25%
44%
7%
34%
0%
25%
0%
3★
13%
33%
7%
2%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close