Universidad El Bosque vs Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES

Side-by-side comparison from 58 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES (5.00)
Universidad El Bosque: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 4/7 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 1/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 1/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.83
Win
4.11
4.07
4.60
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.71
4.56
4.92
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.00
4.86
Win
4.67
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.43
4.33
4.21
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.44
4.85
Win
4.20
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.14
4.22
4.79
Win
4.17
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
3.89
3.85
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
11%
81%
86%
100%
0%
0%
4★
25%
44%
13%
14%
0%
100%
0%
3★
13%
33%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close