Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU vs School of Management Fribourg vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 113 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
- +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
- +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
- +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
- -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone
Nothing to show