Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.