Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +High-quality, experienced faculty
- +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
- +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities
- +High academic quality and standards
- +Flexible study options and time management
- +Committed and qualified professors
Nothing to show
- +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
- +Excellent preparation for the labor market
- +University prestige and history
- +Professional development & industry relevance
- +Life projects & research opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
- -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.
Nothing to show
Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show