Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +High academic quality and standards
- +Flexible study options and time management
- +Committed and qualified professors
- +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
- +Diverse and in-demand programs
- +Convenient campus access
- +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
- +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
- +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
- +quality faculty and student programs
- +good location
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
- -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
- -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.
This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.
An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.
Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.
With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.
With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.
With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show