Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC (4.60)
Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.62
Win
3.95
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Location
4.54
3.96
4.60
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.69
Win
4.52
4.20
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.31
4.30
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.54
Win
4.45
3.80
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.62
Win
4.35
4.40
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.42
Win
3.82
2.20
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, specialized programs
  • +Excellent professors and diverse student body
  • +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
  • +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
  • +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
61%
58%
54%
40%
0%
33%
0%
4★
39%
38%
38%
60%
0%
67%
0%
3★
0%
4%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close