Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Fundación Universidad de América

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA (5.00)
Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC: wins 0/5 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA: wins 5/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/5 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.62
5.00
5.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.54
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.69
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.31
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.54
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.62
5.00
5.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.42
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, specialized programs
  • +Excellent professors and diverse student body
  • +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
  • +Prestigious reputation and quality education
  • +Professors' real-world marketing experience
  • +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

Nothing to show

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
61%
100%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
39%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close