Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ (4.80)
Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC: wins 3/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 4/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.62
4.74
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Location
4.54
4.56
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Professors
4.69
Win
4.68
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.31
4.42
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Student life
4.54
4.63
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Value
4.62
Win
4.47
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.42
Win
4.37
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, specialized programs
  • +Excellent professors and diverse student body
  • +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
61%
85%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
39%
7%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
7%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close