Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO
Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
- +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
- +Strong career support and personal development
- +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
- +Positive and supportive campus environment.
- +Prestigious reputation and quality education
- +Professors' real-world marketing experience
- +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities
- +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
- +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
- +High academic quality and standards
- +Flexible study options and time management
- +Committed and qualified professors
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.
- -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.
Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.
With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.
With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show