University of Buea - UB vs Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies vs University of Dar es salaam - UDSM vs Iran University of Medical Sciences - IUMS vs Biaka University Institute of Buea
Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on knowledge and preparation for the job market
- +Excellent teaching from seasoned professors and professionals
- +Inspiring and beautiful campus environment
- +Strong academic programs with interdisciplinary focus
- +Excellent professors and practical knowledge
- +High reputation and valuable networking opportunities
- +Conducive learning environment and diverse student body
- +Skilled professors and strong academic foundation
- +Organized administration and respected reputation
Nothing to show
- +Supportive learning environment and dedicated faculty
- +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skill development
- +Effective job market preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Academic program intensity and socio-political disruptions.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Excessive tuition fees and poor value for money.
- -Ineffective and insensitive administrative and support services.
- -Unprofessional and judgmental staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of practical application or real-life examples is disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations from staff are common complaints.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Assessing the university reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were awarded for **Location** and **Professors**, indicating excellent campus surroundings and a strong teaching staff. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** received the lowest scores, suggesting room for improvement in these practical aspects. Student life, internationality, and value all performed well, sitting comfortably in the upper range of the ratings.
Academic excellence stands out, with a high rating for professors. Location and internationality also received positive marks. However, student life and accommodation were identified as areas needing improvement, indicated by lower scores. Facilities and overall value fall somewhere in the middle, suggesting a mixed but generally positive perception of the university's offerings.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas, with Location receiving the highest rating. Student Life and Professors also garnered strong scores. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality represent the university's weaker points, although Value and Facilities remain solid. Overall, the ratings suggest a well-rounded experience with distinct strengths and areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This university excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, and student life. Internationality is also a strong suit, rated highly. Accommodations are rated moderately, while the facilities unfortunately received the lowest score. Overall, the university offers good value, with strengths clearly outweighing its single weakness.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Around 80% of reviews praise the university's academic excellence, practical learning, and skilled lecturers. A small percentage (~4%) mention disruptions due to the socio-political crisis and issues with a lecturer.
With a 3/5 average rating, reviews show ~33% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight theoretical/practical knowledge and reputation, while negative feedback points to high tuition and unhelpful administrative support.
With an average rating of 4.41/5, ~94% of reviews are positive, highlighting a conducive learning environment, competent professors, and a respected reputation. A small percentage (~3%) noted a need for more practical application and modern resources.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the university received a 4/5 rating. This positive feedback highlighted a conducive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and a comprehensive, practical curriculum. Negative feedback was negligible.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A university with a unique history. It was the first English university that was established in Cameroon in the year 1992 and went operational in the year 1993. So, it is a mother university. University of Buea is described as A PLACE TO BE by many. Located at the foot of mount Cameroon, it is a prestigious university full of knowledge, skill and cultural diversity in Cameroon. In case you visit Cameroon, it will be a pleasure for you to pay a courtesy visit to the mother English university
The Graduate Institute Geneva (IHEID) is one of the worst educational institutions in Switzerland. It's important to dive into the specifics as to why. When it comes to a master’s degree in Switzerland, tuition ranges from 500–2,000 Swiss francs, however, IHEID charges foreign students a whopping 8,000 Swiss francs. While you may argue that American universities charge more and so therefore this is a bargain, you would be dumbfounded to experience some of the educational conditions in comparison to American universities. • Scholarships: For over a decade, IHEID has shown no transparency on its scholarships. At this point, it can be assumed that something terribly wrong is going on behind the scene, as they have refused to show how many scholarship packages are provided but have justified an increase in tuition in this manner. IHEID has been audited by so many governmental agencies it reeks of fraudulent governance. The institute has been financially audited, its governance has been audited, even its sexual harassment mechanism has been audited. • Student Representation: The Institute has been called out for a lack of student involvement for years, going far as appearing in front of state officials to plead their case. It is clear however that the new director enjoys this level of student participation as she cancelled her meetings with the student association for over 3 months this past 2021 summer, to punish them, for an article that was written in the independent student press. She has called members of the association intimidating and harassing when they have advocated for better housing services. The trauma some members of the association have faced has pushed them into depression, and psychotic breaks. Alumni of the association have experienced these tactics throughout generations and is an integral part of the IHEID student association experience. • Sexual and Moral Harassment: IHEID Senior administrators have been accused of sexual harassment for over ten years, while the directrice herself has recently been accused of intimidating and threatening members of the Student Association, IHEID student journalists and independent advocates. IHEID’s most valuable asset isn't its students, but its reputation and anyone that attempts to bring anything to light is disposable. As a 2014 article states, if you do not like the Institute, you can leave”. • Career Services: As a foreign student, Switzerland is a distinctively difficult country to migrate to. You are effectively competing against the Swiss/permanent residents, and then Europeans as they are legally prioritized in terms of visas. Unless you are in one of those situations, your status will be considered a third-country national (Asians, Africans, Americans). How is it them that career services only have 1–2 people on staff for a 1000 student institution? Furthermore, the IHEID does not recognize institutional racism, and it, therefore, does not provide resistance techniques to counter these policies. • No skill-based centres: Where American universities may have writing centres, IHEID does not make any effort to close the academic gap between students whose language isn't English or may have studied in another language in their bachelors. You also do not have any math, Econ, or stats centre to gain help or tutoring when needed. • The Interdisciplinary program: Additionally, if you happened to have chosen the Masters in International Development, you will soon notice that you are actually not learning much. The quality of the core courses is far below the quality promised. Essentially, you are buying a degree and you do not need to invest too much time or effort into your courses. It is also not expected; Professors in the Interdisciplinary program do not connect with you in the same way other program professors do. Actually, the program is referred to as the Cash Cow of the Institute by professors themselves. This program will not teach you IR concepts, the bare minimum of political science, such as you would in a government 101 class. ○ Students Background: Since there are no IR or Policy sci requirements to enter this program, your peers can have studied biology or English literature. This will impact the level of academic rigour you will be exposed to. • Teaching Assistants: Their salaries have not been increased in over 7 years. When they sign their contracts they are not shown internal regulations or teaching staff regulations. They are not only the least paid in the entire country when recently told they may get a raise, but their social benefits such as unemployment are also significantly reduced. The manner in which they are treated those not encourage master students to rely on them for academic support. IHEID’s priority is to build its reputation on the backs of students, particularly students of diversity. The Institute counts on students’ ties with the institution to avoid improving its services. As a student whose visa is associated with the school, I am less likely to revolt. The same can be said for students under scholarships, or employed by it. It is a terrible place to conduct one’s study and I would not recommend it to my worst enemy. Below are some of the articles written that convey the previous facts: particularly the latest developments regarding the ongoing movement; No more silencing students.
I would rate my Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology from the University of Dar es Salaam quite positively overall. The program offered a strong academic foundation and equipped me with essential critical thinking and research skills. It provided a valuable perspective on the complexities of human societies and cultures, helping me understand the intricate relationship between people, their environments, and the systems they create. Several aspects of the program stood out to me. Notably, Dr. Dauda’s course on ecology and culture was eye-opening—highlighting how cultural practices directly influence ecosystems and vice versa. Dr. Kamughisha made a significant impact through his teachings on both qualitative and quantitative research methods, fostering a balanced and analytical approach to anthropological inquiry. Dr. Jacqueline’s classes offered deep insights into society and culture, as well as pressing urban problems and contemporary anthropological issues. While the program was intellectually enriching, I believe it would benefit from more modern resources and practical field-based learning opportunities. Nonetheless, the knowledge and perspective I gained have been transformative, both academically and personally. I would recommend this program to anyone interested in understanding the deeper layers of human behavior, society, and culture.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show