University of Belgrade vs The John Naisbitt University vs Singidunum University - UPIS vs University of Defence - UO vs Dr Lazar Vrkatic Faculty of Law and Business Studies
Side-by-side comparison from 145 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and high-quality academic programs.
- +Supportive and accessible faculty.
- +Vibrant student life and opportunities.
- +Practical experience through internships
- +Engaging lectures and seminars
- +Supportive faculty and professors
- +Strong theoretical and practical knowledge acquisition.
- +Dynamic and engaging academic atmosphere with a supportive community.
- +Career-focused learning opportunities and approachable professors.
- +Quality of teaching and research support
- +Opportunities for professional development and research involvement
- +Institutional commitment to advancing higher education standards
- +Supportive professors and foreign lecturers
- +Accessible learning resources and technology
- +Financial aid and scholarships
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues, including poor course structure and lack of professor engagement.
- -Excessive and irrelevant course content, often leading to an overwhelming workload.
- -Outdated materials and teaching methods that do not prepare students for practical application.
- -Declining academic quality and poor career prospects.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Many find the facilities outdated and lacking in technology.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of academic support and engagement
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Considering the provided ratings, this institution shines brightest in its **Location**, receiving an outstanding 4.6. Student life is also a significant strength, with a rating of 4.3. Areas with the lowest scores include **Internationality** at 3.25 and **Accomodation** at approximately 3.6. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these aspects.
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates that all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are performing at the lowest possible level. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses, as all areas present an equal and concerning lack of positive performance.
Offering a generally positive assessment, the university excels particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both scoring a high 4.43. Areas such as **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** also received strong ratings, clustering around 4.14. The lowest score, though still respectable at 4.0, is for **internationality**.
This university presents a uniform picture across all surveyed categories, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Ratings are consistently zero for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates an absence of positive or negative feedback in these key university aspects.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution achieved perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated a maximum of five. This indicates an outstanding and consistently high-quality experience in every surveyed area, with no particular strengths or weaknesses to highlight as all categories performed equally at the highest level.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of 132 reviews are positive, highlighting exciting university life, growth, and staff support. A small amount of negative feedback (around 3.8%) mentions tedious classes and disengaged professors.
One positive review highlights practical experience and internships, while one negative review points to declining lecture quality and perceived poor graduate employability. Sentiment is split, with approximately 50% of feedback being negative.
Approximately 89% of reviews are highly positive (4–5 stars), highlighting strong theoretical/practical knowledge and engaging academic environments. No negative reviews were provided.
With one review averaging 5/5 stars, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights the university's integrated approach to improving higher education and fostering research.
With one review averaging 5/5, ~100% positive feedback highlights considerate professors and good connections with language schools. New classrooms, foreign lecturers, and scholarships were also noted. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am studying at the Medical Faculty of the University of Belgrade, majoring in Integrated Academic Studies in Medicine. What bothers people the most is what direction it is, how long the studies last and how long they study. My course lasts 6 years and after those 6 years it is calculated as if you have completed basic and master studies (6 0), hence the name of the integrated study in the name of the course. After completing 6 years, you acquire the right to the title of doctor of medicine, after which you can opt for further education or specialization that you want, but do not have to, you can work as a general practitioner. About 500 students enroll in my major each year, with all the list moves. In addition to my major, there are also basic academic studies of nursing, but also medicine in English, which is a more expensive variant of my major and costs 7000eur per year. At the medical school, non-budget students are a rarity, because if you give year after year, you are on a budget, because when you pass the conditional exams for the next year, you have fulfilled the right to budget funding. For self-financing students, the tuition fee is around 127,000 dinars. The faculty is not very organized and requires a lot of personal commitment. Professors are also doctors, so professorship is not their primary job, which is reflected in most cases in their lack of interest, but if you show interest, they are always ready to meet you and help as much as they can and know. In general, the concept of the faculty is different from the others, because it contains a lot of practical subjects, and attendance at all forms of teaching is mandatory, which can be exhausting, but it lasts. The first three years of study are the so-called preclinical years, where obstetric subjects are taught, which provide some fundamental knowledge and general principles of structure and function of the human body, but every year there is one clinical subject that requires work with patients in hospital. The next 3 years are clinical and the exercises are reduced to working in the hospital and learning the practical part. I would recommend to anyone who likes that vocation to enroll in my college, but not if they are not sure, because to the people who enroll, because they did not know what else or at the urging of someone else, the collapse will be a real torture. The faculty is located within the Clinical Center of Serbia, so it is well connected with all parts of the city. What is a problem is the distance to the nearest canteen. It takes about half an hour to get to the first canteen, which is usually not enough in the break between lectures for lunch. In addition to the educational part, the faculty also offers a handful of sports and entertainment activities, as well as its own cafe (which in my opinion is important). Parties, excursions, but also serious trips are often organized, as well as the famous Medicinijada, which is organized every year in Montenegro.
Back then (in my student days) John Naisbitt University was Megatrend University. I graduated from Faculty of business studies and as years were passing by I realized that quality of lectures, seminars and exams significantly dropped off, to the point where I was aware that it is going to be really difficult to continue with a career. Nowadays employers skip most of CVs with John Naisbitt graduates because they know that quality of their knowledge is weak and working habits are bad. For instance, 8 out of 10 John Naisbitt graduates, including myself got their internship/job because of their relatives, cousins or even friends with influence. Unfortunately, this is the way things are going in Serbia. I would highly recommend for fresh students to skip John Naisbitt University because private universities in Serbia are not being controlled by the government and their goal is just to "produce" graduates. However, faculties of the Belgrade University and the University of Novi Sad give really strong basis to graduates and employers around the world know that these students got their marks by hard work and commitment.
I love being around open-minded people which this university really has. I think that the best thing about this program is that it teaches you everything that you need in your career and gives you the opportunity right after you finish it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show