University of Belgrade vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Universidad de Cartagena - UNICARTAGENA vs Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar - UNITECNOLÓGICA vs Universidad Libre - UniLibre

Side-by-side comparison from 140 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Belgrade: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad de Cartagena - UNICARTAGENA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar - UNITECNOLÓGICA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 4/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Dankook University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Belgrade, Serbia
3.90
Read more reviews
133 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: MSc in Digital Marketing and AI
Best programme: Medicine
Seoul, South Korea
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.61
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.03
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.22
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.34
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
2.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.58
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for industry readiness.
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff.
  • +Diverse and high-quality academic programs.
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +High-quality faculty and demanding admission process
  • +Strong academic environment and knowledgeable student body
  • +Good professor staff and continuous faculty development
  • +Ideal equipment, spaces, and attractive facilities
  • +Rewarding challenges and wealth of learning
  • +Improved course registration and scheduling
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and organizational issues are prevalent.
  • -Professors lack motivation and student engagement.
  • -Curriculum is often irrelevant, overwhelming, and outdated.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication from management.
  • -Outdated technology and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Lack of student support services and unresponsive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Communication problems and a disconnect with faculty create dissatisfaction.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Among the evaluated aspects, location stands out as the strongest with an impressive rating of 4.61. Student life also scores highly at 4.34. Conversely, internationality presents the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.22. Facilities and accommodation are mid-range at 3.69 and 3.58 respectively, while professors and value show solid performance around the 4.0 mark.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received zero ratings. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses to highlight. The university presents a uniformly low performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

This institution garners its highest marks in student life, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and professors also receive commendable ratings, indicating a solid academic and physical environment. Conversely, the university's location, accommodation, internationality, and value for money are rated as average, suggesting areas where improvements could be considered to enhance the overall student experience.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting balanced theory/practice, industry preparation, and exciting university life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions outdated materials and disengaged professors.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

This university is highly praised, with ~100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high academic standards. One minor suggestion mentions improving installations due to potential resource delays.

This university garners strong positive feedback (~100% positive reviews), with students highlighting rewarding experiences and excellent facilities. However, some mention minor drawbacks like inconvenient class schedules and limited course registration options.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
22%
100%
100%
0%
33%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade

I am studying at the Medical Faculty of the University of Belgrade, majoring in Integrated Academic Studies in Medicine. What bothers people the most is what direction it is, how long the studies last and how long they study. My course lasts 6 years and after those 6 years it is calculated as if you have completed basic and master studies (6 0), hence the name of the integrated study in the name of the course. After completing 6 years, you acquire the right to the title of doctor of medicine, after which you can opt for further education or specialization that you want, but do not have to, you can work as a general practitioner. About 500 students enroll in my major each year, with all the list moves. In addition to my major, there are also basic academic studies of nursing, but also medicine in English, which is a more expensive variant of my major and costs 7000eur per year. At the medical school, non-budget students are a rarity, because if you give year after year, you are on a budget, because when you pass the conditional exams for the next year, you have fulfilled the right to budget funding. For self-financing students, the tuition fee is around 127,000 dinars. The faculty is not very organized and requires a lot of personal commitment. Professors are also doctors, so professorship is not their primary job, which is reflected in most cases in their lack of interest, but if you show interest, they are always ready to meet you and help as much as they can and know. In general, the concept of the faculty is different from the others, because it contains a lot of practical subjects, and attendance at all forms of teaching is mandatory, which can be exhausting, but it lasts. The first three years of study are the so-called preclinical years, where obstetric subjects are taught, which provide some fundamental knowledge and general principles of structure and function of the human body, but every year there is one clinical subject that requires work with patients in hospital. The next 3 years are clinical and the exercises are reduced to working in the hospital and learning the practical part. I would recommend to anyone who likes that vocation to enroll in my college, but not if they are not sure, because to the people who enroll, because they did not know what else or at the urging of someone else, the collapse will be a real torture. The faculty is located within the Clinical Center of Serbia, so it is well connected with all parts of the city. What is a problem is the distance to the nearest canteen. It takes about half an hour to get to the first canteen, which is usually not enough in the break between lectures for lunch. In addition to the educational part, the faculty also offers a handful of sports and entertainment activities, as well as its own cafe (which in my opinion is important). Parties, excursions, but also serious trips are often organized, as well as the famous Medicinijada, which is organized every year in Montenegro.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close