London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Northampton vs Aberystwyth University - ABER vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs The University of Cambridge Judge Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 384 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
University of Northampton: wins 0/7 categories
Aberystwyth University - ABER: wins 3/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
The University of Cambridge Judge Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
University of the Highlands and Islands - UHI: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Northampton, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
24 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Aberystwyth, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: History
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: BA International Studies
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: English Literature
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.43
4.42
4.00
4.00
4.56
Win
3.00
Location
4.78
4.00
4.30
3.57
3.00
4.78
5.00
Win
Professors
4.26
3.96
4.45
4.00
4.00
4.67
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
3.91
4.35
4.14
4.00
4.67
4.00
Student life
3.63
3.62
4.25
Win
3.71
4.00
4.00
2.00
Value
4.04
4.00
4.20
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.78
3.68
4.26
Win
3.50
3.00
3.22
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Well-organized programs and available technology
  • +Helpful staff and supportive learning environment
  • +Access to specialized equipment and resources
  • +Welcoming and inclusive community
  • +Engaging course content and supportive learning
  • +Beautiful coastal location
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Insightful, well-structured academic work
  • +Balanced theory and critical thinking
  • +Clear understanding and coherent arguments
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Innovative delivery model
  • +Accessible, skilled lecturers
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of support.
  • -Rushed and confusing teaching leading to increased independent learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Perceived unfair treatment of international students
  • -Negative impact on future career prospects
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving a high score of 4.43, and offers good **Value** at 4.0. Areas receiving slightly lower scores, indicating potential for improvement, include **Student Life** (3.62) and **Accomodation** (3.68). **Professors** and **Internationality** also score well, around 3.9, with **Location** rated a solid 4.0.

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **Professors** (4.45) and **Facilities** (4.42). **Internationality** also scores well at 4.35. The university maintains a solid standing across other areas, including **Location** (4.3), **Accomodation** (4.26), and **Student Life** (4.25). Its **Value** is rated at 4.2, rounding out its generally positive feedback.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, earning high marks in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. These areas indicate a robust and supportive environment for students. Conversely, its Location and Accommodation received moderate ratings, suggesting these aspects may be areas for potential improvement compared to other evaluated components.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Perceived strengths of this institution lie in its excellent professors, ideal location, and strong international presence, all earning high marks. Student life is identified as a weaker area, receiving a notably lower rating. Other aspects, including facilities, accommodation, and overall value, fall within a positive range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Most reviews are positive (~92%), highlighting excellent modules, organised programmes, updated facilities, and friendly colleagues. A small percentage (~8%) of negative feedback mentioned course quality decline due to online learning and lack of support.

Approximately 95% of reviews are positive, highlighting tailored support, an inclusive culture, and engaging modules. The coastal location and strong sense of community are frequently praised. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This feedback is positive, highlighting a well-structured and insightful perspective.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight UHI's unique partnership model with colleges. Students appreciate the skilled lecturers and innovative video-conferencing approach connecting diverse locations across Scotland.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
38%
55%
43%
0%
67%
0%
4★
44%
46%
40%
29%
100%
33%
100%
3★
19%
8%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
4%
5%
14%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Great University

I like the university overall. The tutors are helpful. The facilities are great. The university accommodation is great. There's a good representation of nationalities. The location is quite remote cause theres not much nearby. However the student life is satisfying.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close