London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs University of East London - UEL vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Glasgow Caledonian University

Side-by-side comparison from 712 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: London Academy of Trading - LAT (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
City St George’s, University of London - City: wins 0/7 categories
University of East London - UEL: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
Glasgow Caledonian University: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 7/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Law
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
107 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
139 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.35
4.29
4.44
4.46
5.00
Win
4.40
Location
4.78
4.48
4.36
4.75
4.76
5.00
Win
4.70
Professors
4.26
4.21
4.24
4.76
4.34
5.00
Win
4.60
Internationality
4.80
4.33
4.25
4.62
4.53
5.00
Win
4.60
Student life
3.65
4.12
3.89
4.58
4.36
5.00
Win
3.90
Value
4.05
4.12
4.14
4.52
4.49
5.00
Win
3.90
Accommodation
3.80
3.95
3.66
4.35
3.94
4.50
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff
  • +Excellent location and vibrant surrounding environment
  • +High employability support and valuable internship opportunities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Modern campus facilities and city access
  • +Practical, industry-relevant learning and skill development
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
  • +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
  • +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Poor teaching quality and low academic standards.
  • -Unmet expectations and perceived focus on profit over student learning.
  • -Inappropriate course focus for experienced professionals.
  • -- Poor academic quality and irrelevant course content.
  • -- Inaccessible staff support and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -- Unsupportive management and inadequate facilities.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
  • -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution achieves impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Facilities, rated at 4.35, and Internationality, at 4.33. Student Life and Location also perform well, both above 4.1. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.95, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid standing with a slight opportunity for enhancement in student housing.

A comprehensive assessment reveals strong performance in several key areas. Location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by Facilities and Internationality. Professors also receive favorable marks. Student Life is rated moderately well, while Value demonstrates a solid performance. The weakest area identified is Accomodation.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

With a 4.3/5 average rating from 106 reviews, ~91.5% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights strong courses, knowledgeable staff, and ideal city-centre locations. Very few reviews (approx. 1.9%) express dissatisfaction.

With a 4.26 rating and ~83% positive feedback, students highlight supportive tutors, modern facilities, and practical learning. A small minority (~4%) experienced unhelpful staff and course relevance issues.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
42%
48%
76%
52%
100%
60%
4★
44%
50%
36%
24%
40%
0%
40%
3★
18%
7%
13%
0%
8%
0%
0%
2★
2%
1%
3%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1★
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

The university in general

One positive thing about the university is that they really do emphasise the importance employability and getting that professional experience. I do admire that a lot since they put an importance on preparing students for their future careers. One downside that I have is that there is not much support when it comes to internships and placements which is a bit frustrating since we are left to our own resources. Rather than the university collaborating with companies to make placements mandatory within the course its an option. So we are not guarranted an internship or placement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close