London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Birmingham vs University of St Andrews vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 732 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Beautiful and well-maintained campus
- +High-quality, engaging, and practical teaching
- +Excellent course structure and student support
- +Excellent academic programs and inspiring learning environment
- +Vibrant student community and diverse extracurricular activities
- +Supportive professors and abundant student resources
- +Diverse student body and international environment
- +Supportive and approachable faculty/teachers
- +Good facilities and varied course offerings
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Engaging and supportive teaching with practical application
- +Vibrant student life, inclusive societies, and social opportunities
- +Strong academic reputation and appealing campus and city environment
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Poor disability and mental health support
- -Ineffective student guild management
- -Overcrowded lectures and unprofessional lecturers
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Disappointing teaching quality and organizational issues
- -Disruptions from strikes and poor value for money
- -Lack of lecturer availability and communication problems
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Discrimination and cultural insensitivity towards international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, this university receives favorable ratings, with the strongest areas being Location (4.44) and Facilities (4.38). Student life and internationality also score well, both above 4.28. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.95, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Professors and value for money are rated moderately well, around 4.14 and 4.05 respectively.
Exhibiting a predominantly positive performance, the university excels in its **Professors** category with a score of 4.51, closely followed by strong showings in **Student Life** and **Internationality** (both 4.46). While **Facilities** (4.29) and **Value** (4.38) also receive favorable marks, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, rated at 3.77. **Location** is rated moderately at 4.06.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. **Accommodations** are rated the lowest among the surveyed categories. Other areas like **professors**, **facilities**, and **student life** all score well, indicating a generally positive experience. **Value** for money also registers favorably.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Student life and professor quality emerge as the university's strongest points, both scoring above 4.1. Internationality and facilities also received favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.64. Location and value for money are rated reasonably well, around 3.94.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With an average rating of 4.16, ~74% of 186 reviews are positive, praising beautiful campuses and quality teaching. Just ~1.6% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with student support.
~95% of university student reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education and academics. The beautiful coastal town, vibrant community, extensive resources, and supportive professors are frequently praised. There is virtually no negative feedback.
Approximately 98.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, helpful faculty, and good campus facilities. A small portion of feedback notes inconsistent teaching quality and organizational issues.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive teaching, engaging courses, and vibrant student life. Two reviews (approximately 5%) express concerns about discrimination and a poor COVID-19 response.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
