London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs The University of Edinburgh vs Anglia Ruskin University - ARU vs Falmouth University vs Leeds Beckett University
Side-by-side comparison from 632 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Excellent faculty and engaging lectures
- +Diverse student community and global opportunities
- +Top-tier facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Supportive staff and faculty
- +Welcoming and inclusive campus community
- +Engaging learning and practical skill development
- +Hands-on experience and industry opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and accessible help
- +Flexible course structure and modern facilities
- +Engaging and practical courses
- +Supportive tutors and welcoming community
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus atmosphere
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Amazing and supportive staff
- +Positive learning experience and engaging courses
- +Beautiful campus environment
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and impact student experience.
- -University relies on prestige without investing in student experience improvements.
- -Programmatic offerings and facilities can fall short of expectations.
- -Poor quality of teaching and unresponsive staff.
- -Unreliable IT infrastructure, particularly internet access during exams.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and scheduling errors.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Lack of academic support and poor quality of lectures/module content.
- -Inadequate career advice and limited career prospects.
- -Administrative issues and expensive, poor-quality accommodation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of effective communication
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution garners particularly strong scores in **Location** (4.78) and **Internationality** (4.51), alongside positive feedback for **Student Life** (4.42) and **Facilities** (4.32). Professors also receive favorable ratings (4.22). The university's **Accommodations** are its lowest-rated area (3.86), though overall **Value** remains solid at 4.0.
An assessment of university ratings reveals a strong performance in several key areas. Location stands out as the highest-rated category, closely followed by Facilities and Internationality. Student Life and Professors also receive positive marks. The university's Accomodation, however, is its weakest performing area, receiving the lowest rating. Value for money is also rated well.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in key areas, with **Facilities** receiving the highest rating at 4.24. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score well, both exceeding 4.1. Notably, **Accomodation** emerges as the area with the lowest rating, registering at 3.76. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value are all rated solidly around the 4.0 mark.
Performing exceptionally well, the university's **Location** and **Student Life** stand out with the highest ratings. Areas receiving more moderate scores include **Facilities** and **Professors**, while **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. The **Value** for money received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, earning a perfect score, and **Professors**, receiving a high rating. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also stand out positively. However, the university's **Value** is rated as its weakest point, with a score of 3. Facilities and accommodation received moderate, middle-ground scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With a 4.29 average rating from 131 reviews, approximately 84% praise excellent faculty, facilities, and varied student opportunities. A small ~1.5% of feedback noted issues with lecturer strikes and program expectations.
~94% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive teaching, a welcoming campus, and opportunities for skill development. A small amount of negative feedback notes issues with lecture quality and internet connectivity.
Nearly all of the 46 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and excellent facilities. Students appreciate the hands-on experience and opportunities offered, with no negative feedback recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising tutors, the student community, and interesting courses. A small ~8.7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with lecture delivery, course content, and a lack of support.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlighted stunning facilities and friendly people. Brilliant lecturers and insightful courses were also noted.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Overall the university is good, they have an easy way to apply for extensions on coursework, and special circumstances, which my personal tutor was more than happy to help with, she really was the best. My supervisor for my dissertation was also really supportive and helped through the challenging times. The lecturers are usually helpful if you are stuck, but there were some who would do the bare minimum for the students.
I was pleased by the Cambridge Campus, which is pretty lovely. Positives aside, lectures and seminars are of such terrible quality. I feel like I've wasted almost $30,000 and four years. Some of the teachers look careless since they don't reply to emails (of course there are a few good ones as well). The number of students using the internet is too high, and it crashed during an exam, creating issues and unneeded stress. My schedule was still incorrect after three months of study, 90% of my classmates and I didn't have all the modules on our ARU websites, and the grades were supposed to be cleared and published two months before but still hadn't been. Nobody seems to have an explanation or knowledge of the cause of the delays when you query the staff about them. Simply put, this is disorganized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
