London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Greenwich School of Management vs London School of Management Education - LSME
Side-by-side comparison from 563 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical learning and real-world skills
- +Experienced and supportive faculty
- +Inclusive and collaborative environment
- +Excellent lecturers and strong academic programmes.
- +Amazing staff support and welcoming environment.
- +Encouragement to further education and personal development.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Strong focus on practical and real-world application
- +Welcoming and sociable student environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Limited course variety and depth.
- -Inconsistent faculty quality and support.
- -Inconvenient campus locations and access.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling ignored.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring themes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern. The strongest areas are Facilities and Value, both scoring a high 4.1. Internationality also performs well at 3.5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point with a low 1.85 rating. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating areas with potential for improvement.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its teaching quality, vibrant student life, prime location, and strong international focus, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation is a significant area for improvement, rated at zero. Facilities and overall value are also highly regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving 4.5 stars. Its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also score well with a solid 4 stars. The university demonstrates excellence in student experience and practical aspects, with areas of strong student support and campus amenities.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with roughly 50% negative feedback. Students appreciate practical learning and experienced faculty, but some note a limited course selection.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. The student praised excellent lecturers and exceptional support from staff.
Both reviews are highly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 average. Students praised supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, a strong focus on employability, and a welcoming, friendly atmosphere with sociable students.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
