London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hull vs University of Kent vs Falmouth University vs University of Chester
Side-by-side comparison from 631 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Strong academic support and tailored programs
- +Vibrant campus life and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical application
- +Supportive and engaging teaching from experienced professors.
- +Beautiful campus and excellent on-site facilities and resources.
- +Valuable career support and unique course/degree opportunities.
- +Hands-on experience and industry opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and accessible help
- +Flexible course structure and modern facilities
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers
- +Well-designed, engaging courses with practical learning
- +Strong sense of community and friendships
- +Engaging and practical courses
- +Supportive tutors and welcoming community
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus atmosphere
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Ethical concerns regarding the law department's affiliations and invited speakers.
- -Perceived corruption and human rights violations associated with university partnerships.
- -Negative impact on the university's reputation and the student experience.
- -Poor quality teaching and lack of lecturer expertise.
- -Insufficient financial resources impacting the department.
- -Limited student support and focus on student development.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Inadequate student support and assignment aid are major frustrations.
- -Poor quality of teaching and unhelpful lecturers are a significant issue.
- -The social environment and lack of inclusive campus culture are disliked.
- -Lack of academic support and poor quality of lectures/module content.
- -Inadequate career advice and limited career prospects.
- -Administrative issues and expensive, poor-quality accommodation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
The surveyed university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Facilities**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed categories. Other areas like Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a generally positive mid-range, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience with specific room for improvement in living arrangements.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Location** also scored highly, indicating positive aspects in these areas. Conversely, **Value** presents as the weakest point, with the lowest score. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately, alongside **Professors**, suggesting room for improvement in these student experience components.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in key areas, with **Facilities** receiving the highest rating at 4.24. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score well, both exceeding 4.1. Notably, **Accomodation** emerges as the area with the lowest rating, registering at 3.76. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value are all rated solidly around the 4.0 mark.
Academic strengths are evident, with professors receiving the highest marks. The university also performs well in location and facilities. Student life and accommodation received similar, solid ratings. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score among the surveyed categories, though it still represents a moderate level of global engagement.
Performing exceptionally well, the university's **Location** and **Student Life** stand out with the highest ratings. Areas receiving more moderate scores include **Facilities** and **Professors**, while **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. The **Value** for money received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Most reviews (approx. 74%) highlight positive experiences, citing strong academic support and a vibrant campus life. A smaller percentage (approx. 12.5%) raises concerns, particularly regarding the law department and ethical considerations.
With ~87% positive feedback, students highlight a lively, beautiful campus, kind professors, and engaging teaching. A small ~2.3% of reviews mention poor teaching quality and lack of student development focus.
Nearly all of the 46 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and excellent facilities. Students appreciate the hands-on experience and opportunities offered, with no negative feedback recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, well-structured courses, and engaging learning experiences. A small percentage (~4.9%) of feedback mentions issues with student support and program effectiveness.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising tutors, the student community, and interesting courses. A small ~8.7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with lecture delivery, course content, and a lack of support.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Unethical law department that invites judges who conduct oppression and violation of human human rights. Employs lecturer Niaz who attacks innocent visitors to the University. If this is the representation of the law department then God help us all.
The chemistry degree is just a total waste of time and money , since 2020 many of the good lecturers have left which means that the bad ones remain. In every university you get bad teachers which is a given,but when the department is already small the bad ones remain.. a perfect example of this is the lack of effort what people need to understand that the chemistry department has zero money all the funding comes from teaching which is is at a loss so your only choice is to share modules with Forensic science students which has lots of money just to keep chemistry department a float. I have left Kent two years now not used a single bit of what I was taught... and many others have also experienced this. You should be aware that Kent teaches you so little it like a trap and to be honest I have met few people who have simply not prepared for working with other departments because they lack the skills due to bad training. I mean when your O-chem lecturers are just SS of a book what dose that tell you about the people who work there 🤔 just don't care ! I really don't see why anyone would ever go to Kent when there are so many other university that offer so much more. I mean I learned more from lecturer notes from my colleagues from different universities than the ones from my department! The courses are terrible with very little room for learning what you want to as they are all compulsory. STAY AWAY.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
