London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hull vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs Bishop Burton College vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 512 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Strong academic support and tailored programs
- +Vibrant campus life and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical application
- +Central location and accessibility
- +Knowledgeable and supportive staff/tutors
- +High-quality, engaging education and opportunities
- +Comprehensive and engaging curriculum.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Vibrant campus community and opportunities.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and helpful teaching staff
- +Affordable tuition and good value
- +Abundant career and internship opportunities
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Ethical concerns regarding the law department's affiliations and invited speakers.
- -Perceived corruption and human rights violations associated with university partnerships.
- -Negative impact on the university's reputation and the student experience.
- -Poor teaching quality and ineffective lectures.
- -Lack of academic rigor and research standards.
- -Financial focus over student learning and career preparation.
- -Lack of clarity and consistency in academic and administrative processes.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Insufficient support and engagement from faculty and university staff.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect with instructors are prevalent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
The surveyed university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Facilities**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed categories. Other areas like Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a generally positive mid-range, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience with specific room for improvement in living arrangements.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving ratings above 4.3. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score highly, indicating positive academic and social environments. The **Value** proposition is solid at over 4.1. However, **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score, falling below 4.0, suggesting it could benefit from improvement.
This institution presents a mixed performance in its university ratings. Its strongest aspect is the location, scoring a solid 4. Conversely, student life received a notably low score of 0, indicating a significant area for improvement. Ratings for facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and value are all consistent at a moderate 3.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across all surveyed areas, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no discernible weak areas; the university excels uniformly, suggesting a consistently high-quality experience for its students.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Most reviews (approx. 74%) highlight positive experiences, citing strong academic support and a vibrant campus life. A smaller percentage (approx. 12.5%) raises concerns, particularly regarding the law department and ethical considerations.
With a 4.32 average rating from 101 reviews, approximately 93% are positive, praising the university's excellent location, helpful staff, and engaging course content. A small 2% of feedback offered criticism.
This university received a single review, rating it 1 out of 5 stars. The feedback was entirely negative, expressing concerns about speaker selection for an event.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
This university has overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students praise the helpful teachers, affordability, and numerous opportunities for jobs and internships.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Unethical law department that invites judges who conduct oppression and violation of human human rights. Employs lecturer Niaz who attacks innocent visitors to the University. If this is the representation of the law department then God help us all.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
