London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Chichester College vs Cardiff Business School vs Lancaster University Management School - LUMS
Side-by-side comparison from 382 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Diverse assessment methods and flexible study options
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Dedicated faculty & practical learning focus
- +Supportive, inclusive campus environment
- +Excellent teaching methods & student support
- +Excellent, supportive lecturers and creative teaching methods.
- +Strong student support services and good career prospects.
- +Interesting course content and a good learning experience.
- +Strong business programmes and career preparation
- +Good campus facilities and community engagement
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development
- +Engaging, practical learning with supportive, expert professors
- +Excellent student support for diverse needs and smooth transitions
- +Vibrant social life, active societies, and a friendly, community atmosphere
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in courses are recurring issues.
- -Insufficient social life and a judgmental environment are frequently mentioned complaints.
- -Inconsistent grading, administrative inefficiencies, and inadequate student support services are significant concerns.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Students frequently express dissatisfaction with course content and teaching quality.
- -Administrative & management issues created chaos and imbalance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Insufficient resources and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
This institution receives its highest marks for **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), indicating a significant global presence and desirable setting. **Professors** are also highly rated (4.26). Areas with the lowest scores are **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accomodation** (3.79), suggesting potential room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience, while **Facilities** (4.04) and **Value** (4.04) fall into a mid-range performance.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This university garners excellent feedback, with professors and facilities receiving the highest marks at 4.75 and 4.5 respectively. Student life and value are also strong points, both rated at 4.25. Location and accommodation present solid, though slightly lower, scores of 4, while internationality also sits at a respectable 4.
Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Location, both receiving a rating of 4.43. Accommodations also score well at 4.38. Student Life is the weakest area surveyed, with a rating of 4.00, followed closely by Internationality at 4.04. Professors and Value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
The university demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities, receiving a top rating. Student life and accommodation also score highly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Internationality is also well-regarded. Conversely, the location is the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other categories. Value and professors receive solid, above-average marks.
Assessed across several key areas, this university demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, receiving a high rating for Professors. Student Life and Facilities also score well, indicating a positive environment and adequate resources. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. The university also performs reasonably well in Location, Internationality, and Value.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting expert faculty, academic reputation, and community. A small ~3.4% of feedback is negative, citing concerns about teaching quality and careers services.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With all four reviews being positive, students highlight the college's supportive environment, helpful instructors, and strong emphasis on practical, engaging learning. Resources and diverse courses also contribute to a fulfilling experience.
With a ~96% positive sentiment, students praise remarkable lecturers, supportive services, and engaging course material. One negative review noted poor overall management and inconsistent workload.
With ~67% of feedback being positive, students highlight fantastic life and academic experiences, exceptional business education facilities, and great opportunities for career preparation. A ~33% of feedback mentions decent instruction and friendly people, with enjoyable sporting events and a good sense of community.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 10 reviews, nearly all students highly praise the university. Recurring themes include supportive lecturers, excellent student support services, and engaging courses.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has been a fantastic life experience as well as a great academic one. I first decided to go to Lancaster University Management School due to its exceptional business education facilities and have not been disappointed. I recommend the university to anybody that wants to put themselves in a strong position for a career upon graduation.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
