London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs ONCAMPUS Global vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM
Side-by-side comparison from 416 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and community
- +Excellent academic environment and facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and effective learning platforms
- +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
- +Practical application through simulators
- +Wide module variety and relevant courses
- +Strong student support and opportunities
- +Practical knowledge for career preparation
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Poor teaching quality and lecturer availability.
- -Significant organizational and administrative problems.
- -Impact of strikes and lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** and **internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Student life** and **facilities** also receive commendable ratings. The area requiring the most improvement appears to be **accommodation**, which has the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in external factors and student engagement.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.
This university excels remarkably in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, as well as strong value. However, significant weaknesses are evident in student life and accommodation, both of which are rated at zero.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Nearly all reviews praise the supportive faculty and vibrant campus atmosphere. Students highlight excellent facilities and a strong sense of community. Isolated negative feedback mentions organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Nothing to show
The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The student highlighted access to diverse modules and courses, strong student support, and preparation for the job market. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
