London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Brunel University London vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs SOAS University of London vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 548 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry experience
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers with expertise
- +Accessible campus facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Welcoming and vibrant campus community
- +Practical learning and real-world exposure
- +Diverse and inclusive community.
- +Global perspectives and academic rigor.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Course content is often repetitive and not applicable to real life.
- -Teaching methods are confusing and make concepts difficult to grasp.
- -Poor organization and lecturer availability are significant problems.
- -Disruptions from strikes negatively impacted the learning experience.
- -The value for money is perceived as poor.
- -Poor administrative support and communication lead to unresolved issues.
- -Lack of adequate support services and advice negatively impacts student well-being and finances.
- -Uncommunicated changes and issues with departmental structure cause significant disruption.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
Nothing to show
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This university garners strong performance in several key areas, notably **Internationality** at 4.36 and **Value** at 4.16. Ratings for **Professors** (4.06) and **Facilities** (4.01) are also commendable. The university's **Location** (3.74) and **Student Life** (3.86) are rated moderately well. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating at 3.63.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Internationality** and **Location** emerging as its strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.5. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are consistently strong, generally falling within the 4.2 to 4.3 range, indicating a well-rounded experience.
This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location**, which received a near-perfect score. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are generally rated well, indicating a solid overall offering with specific strengths and one area for potential improvement.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With a 4.17 average rating from 118 reviews, ~98.3% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical, career-focused learning, helpful lecturers, and good campus resources. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
With a 4.42 average rating from 64 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive faculty, a vibrant community, and a beautiful campus. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.6%) noted organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.
~76% of 34 reviews are positive, praising global perspectives, diverse community, and supportive professors. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 5.9%) mentions issues with administrative support and communication.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am originally from the USA but decided to pursue my Masters degree in London. My university has a large diverse community of students. I was able to thrive in this environment as I was accepted for being myself. I am Proud to be a SOAS graduate.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
Nothing to show
