London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Warwick Business School - WBS vs Kingston Business School vs University of West London vs Cass Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 435 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Exceptional, practical, and rigorous academic programs
- +Supportive and engaging faculty dedicated to student success
- +Global learning environment and vibrant community
- +Supportive & engaged faculty
- +Academic growth & new learning opportunities
- +Prestigious location & student support
- +Industry connections and career opportunities
- +Engaging and relevant curriculum
- +Supportive staff and positive campus environment
- +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
- +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
- +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major complaints.
- -Lack of engagement and irrelevant course content frustrate students.
- -Inconvenient course scheduling and unclear academic policies.
- -Insufficient and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of engagement from faculty and limited career support.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content is irrelevant or outdated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
Nothing to show
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received very strong scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, though still rated favorably. **Value** is also moderately lower compared to other metrics.
Across multiple aspects, the institution receives commendable feedback. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are particularly strong areas, all scoring 4.25. Location and Accommodation are rated well at 4, with Internationality also receiving a solid 4 rating. The university demonstrates a consistent level of quality throughout these evaluated areas.
This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with exceptionally high marks for Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48). Facilities and Location also received very favorable scores. Student Life and Value are well-regarded, though Accomodation presents as the weakest area with a rating of 3.93.
This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
Nearly all 44 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight world-class, rigorous, and practical education, exceptional and supportive faculty, and a globally diverse community.
All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight supportive staff and professors, academic growth opportunities, and manageable workloads as key strengths.
With a 4.45/5 average rating from 51 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the great experiences, strong industry connections leading to job placements, relevant curriculum, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
Nothing to show
