University of Cambridge vs Anglia Ruskin University - ARU vs Bellerbys College vs Cambridge School of Visual & Performing Arts vs Cats College

Side-by-side comparison from 170 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bellerbys College (5.00)
University of Cambridge: wins 0/7 categories
Anglia Ruskin University - ARU: wins 0/7 categories
Bellerbys College: wins 7/7 categories
Cambridge School of Visual & Performing Arts: wins 0/7 categories
Cats College: wins 0/7 categories
The University of Cambridge Judge Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Institute of Commercial Management - ICM: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
99 reviews
×
Best programme: English
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
68 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Studies
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
4.45
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.19
4.59
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.20
4.26
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.16
4.47
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.79
4.24
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.13
4.37
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.87
4.05
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and prestigious reputation.
  • +Excellent teaching staff and approachable lecturers.
  • +Positive social environment and lifelong connections.
  • +Supportive and approachable staff
  • +Welcoming and friendly campus community
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and friendly staff creating a family-like atmosphere.
  • +Excellent teaching and academic facilities.
  • +Vibrant campus life and desirable city location.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Insightful, well-structured academic work
  • +Balanced theory and critical thinking
  • +Clear understanding and coherent arguments

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students often face overwhelming academic intensity.
  • -There are concerns regarding the university's lack of mental health support.
  • -Students perceive administrative issues and a perceived "snobbery" associated with the university's age.
  • -Poor lecture and seminar quality, with some lecturers being unresponsive.
  • -Inadequate internet infrastructure causing disruptions, particularly during exams.
  • -Administrative issues with incorrect scheduling persisting for extended periods.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities detract from the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives commendation for its infrastructure and teaching staff, both scoring over 4.2. Location and international student engagement are also well-regarded, with scores above 4.1. The university's value proposition also scores positively, just above 4.1. Areas for improvement include student life and accommodation, which received lower ratings compared to other aspects.

This university garners strong performance across most assessed areas, with its location receiving the highest mark. Student life and professor quality are also highly rated. Accommodation stands out as the comparatively weakest aspect, though still receiving a respectable score. Internationality and value are also significant strengths.

Exceptional scores were awarded across all assessed aspects. The university received perfect marks in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently strong offering without any discernible weak areas, presenting an outstanding overall picture.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, earning high marks in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. These areas indicate a robust and supportive environment for students. Conversely, its Location and Accommodation received moderate ratings, suggesting these aspects may be areas for potential improvement compared to other evaluated components.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting high academic standards, quality education, and personal growth. A small portion (~8%) of negative feedback mentions intense academic pressure and concerns about student well-being.

Most reviews (approx. 97%) are positive, highlighting a welcoming campus, supportive staff, and engaging learning experiences. A small percentage of feedback (approx. 3%) mentions issues with lecture quality and unreliable internet.

With an average rating of 5/5 from two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight a supportive, family-like atmosphere and excellent academic and physical facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This feedback is positive, highlighting a well-structured and insightful perspective.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
59%
37%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
27%
54%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
6%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
800-year-old University in UK

The University of Cambridge, founded in 1209, stands as one of the oldest and most prestigious institutions in the world. Its origins trace back to scholars fleeing unrest at the University of Oxford, who sought refuge in the city of Cambridge. Over time, this group of scholars evolved into a formal institution, receiving a royal charter from King Edward II in 1318. Cambridge's collegiate system began with the establishment of Peterhouse in 1284, the first of its 31 colleges. During the medieval period, the university focused primarily on theology, philosophy, and classical studies. It gained prominence as a hub for reformist ideas during the Reformation and played a pivotal role in the Scientific Revolution. Notable figures like Sir Isaac Newton, who developed the laws of motion and universal gravitation while at Trinity College, emerged during this time. The 19th century saw Cambridge modernize its curriculum, expanding into the natural sciences, engineering, and the humanities. Charles Darwin, an alumnus of Christ’s College, revolutionized biology with his theory of evolution. By the 20th century, Cambridge had become a leader in research, with its scholars winning numerous Nobel Prizes across disciplines like physics, medicine, and chemistry. In the 21st century, Cambridge continues to excel in education and research, addressing global challenges such as climate change, artificial intelligence, and public health. Its long-standing traditions, coupled with innovation, make it a beacon of learning and discovery. With over 800 years of history, the University of Cambridge remains a symbol of academic excellence and intellectual legacy.

Not worth it

I was pleased by the Cambridge Campus, which is pretty lovely. Positives aside, lectures and seminars are of such terrible quality. I feel like I've wasted almost $30,000 and four years. Some of the teachers look careless since they don't reply to emails (of course there are a few good ones as well). The number of students using the internet is too high, and it crashed during an exam, creating issues and unneeded stress. My schedule was still incorrect after three months of study, 90% of my classmates and I didn't have all the modules on our ARU websites, and the grades were supposed to be cleared and published two months before but still hadn't been. Nobody seems to have an explanation or knowledge of the cause of the delays when you query the staff about them. Simply put, this is disorganized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close