Furtwangen University vs Jordan University of Science and Technology - JUST vs University of Opole vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Fraser International College

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Furtwangen University (5.00)
Furtwangen University: wins 1/3 categories
Jordan University of Science and Technology - JUST: wins 2/3 categories
University of Opole: wins 0/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Fraser International College: wins 0/3 categories
Catholic Kkottongnae University: wins 0/3 categories
University of La Guajira - Uniguajira: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Schwarzwald, Germany
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology Management for Business
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Digital Culture
cheongju, South Korea
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.00
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.25
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
1.00
4.25
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
1.00
4.75
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.75
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent infrastructure and professors
  • +Engaging and enriching environment
  • +Strong industry connections
  • +Strong engineering and technology programs
  • +Positive campus life and career development
  • +Supportive professors and colleagues
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Opportunities for practical experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Lack of up-to-date facilities and resources.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Course content and delivery often fail to meet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Impressive scores highlight the university's excellent facilities and prime location, both receiving perfect marks. Professors and accommodation also fare well, earning strong ratings. However, student life and internationality stand out as significant weaknesses, with the lowest scores in these areas. The overall value for money is rated positively, suggesting a good return on investment despite some drawbacks.

This institution garners strong praise in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for **Location** and a near-perfect rating for **Student Life** and **Value**. **Professors** and **Internationality** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest aspect, receiving a comparatively lower rating. **Facilities** are rated solidly, though not as highly as the leading categories.

This institution generally receives strong reviews, with particularly high marks for **Facilities, Professors, Location,** and **Student Life**, all scoring an impressive 4.25. **Value** stands out as its strongest area, achieving a near-perfect 4.75. The university's **Internationality** is its weakest point, receiving a 3.5 rating, while **Accomodation** also received a slightly lower score of 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This indicates overwhelmingly positive feedback, with no negative reviews found. The single positive review highlights excellent infrastructure, professors, and industry reach.

All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise strong engineering and technology programs, good campus life, and impactful learning experiences. Some suggest more practical courses and new departments.

Four reviews show a 100% positive sentiment, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Recurring positive themes include helpful and supportive staff/lecturers, informative courses, and opportunities to pursue passions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
75%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
25%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close