New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University Marin Barleti - UMB vs Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/3 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/3 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 0/3 categories
University Marin Barleti - UMB: wins 0/3 categories
Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT: wins 3/3 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 0/3 categories
Western Balkans University - WBU: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Applied Information Systems Technology in Network Management
Best programme: Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
3.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.67
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.67
4.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.33
4.67
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.67
4.67
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.33
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Qualified and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive and welcoming university environment
  • +Employment and training opportunities
  • +Practical and relevant skills
  • +Effective teaching and explanations
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not well-implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a perfect five. The university also excels in **student life, internationality, and overall value**, each earning a strong 4.5. Its weakest area, while still positive, is its **location**, rated at 4. Accommodation also scores well at 4.5.

This institution garners exceptional marks across most aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. The standout strengths lie in its academic offerings and vibrant campus environment. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving a rating of zero, indicating a critical area requiring improvement.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the specialized and experienced pedagogical staff, the comfortable environment, and opportunities for employment and training. Negative feedback is minimal.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights strong business information systems education, noting excellent treatment and explanations. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
0%
50%
100%
100%
0%
4★
100%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close