New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University College of Beder vs Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/7 categories
University College of Beder: wins 2/7 categories
Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT: wins 0/7 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 4/7 categories
Western Balkans University - WBU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Best programme: Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
3.67
4.33
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.67
4.33
4.67
Win
3.17
4.50
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.67
4.67
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.33
4.67
Win
4.33
3.17
4.50
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.67
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.67
4.67
4.67
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.33
4.00
4.33
3.67
4.50
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and accessible professors
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +Great location and facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and quality of teaching
  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Good campus environment and facilities
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Lack of practical materials and hands-on learning opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in the "Value" category with a rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0. Conversely, "Location" and "Internationality" received the lowest scores, both at 3.17. Facilities and Accommodation scored moderately well at 3.67, with Student Life closely behind at 3.5.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.

Most students (~83%) praise practical learning, good teachers, and facilities. Some (~17%) report disappointment with practical resources.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
0%
67%
17%
100%
0%
4★
100%
0%
100%
33%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
33%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close