New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of Tirana - UT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs The European University of Tirana - UET vs Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Tirana - UT: wins 0/6 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/6 categories
The European University of Tirana - UET: wins 0/6 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 5/6 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/6 categories
Polis University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Animation
Best programme: Dentistry
Tirana, Albania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.83
3.67
3.50
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.79
4.33
4.00
4.50
Win
3.33
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.58
4.67
4.50
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.67
4.67
Win
4.50
4.50
4.33
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
2.96
4.00
3.75
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.33
4.67
3.75
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.96
4.00
3.00
4.50
Win
3.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff and faculty
  • +Well-organized programs and facilities
  • +Challenging and transformative academic experience
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.
  • +Experienced professors and practical, job-ready training
  • +Professors' willingness to teach and hands-on clinic experience
  • +Preparation for the job market post-graduation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and complaints are ignored.
  • -Teaching quality is poor with professors using their own books and neglecting important topics.
  • -Facilities are outdated and do not meet modern educational needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

With a nuanced performance across several key areas, this university's strengths lie in its **Location**, receiving a commendable 3.79. **Professors** also scored well at 3.58, alongside **Value** at 3.33. Conversely, the **Internationality** of the institution was rated lowest at 2.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life/Accomodation** were also areas needing improvement, both scoring below 3.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Internationality** with a perfect 4.5. Student Life and Value are also strong at 3.75. The main area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating of 3, alongside Facilities at 3.5. Location also scores well at 4.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

This institution excels in internationality and value, both receiving top marks. Facilities, location, and accommodation are rated moderately well. However, student life presents a significant area for improvement, indicated by its lowest score. Professor quality is also a strong point, but not as exceptional as internationalization and value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Approximately 37.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming faculty, organization, and quality learning. A small percentage (~4.2%) expresses dissatisfaction with grading and complaint procedures. The average rating is 3.42/5.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professional and approachable professors, exceptional facilities, and personal growth opportunities. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Students highlight well-prepared professors and effective programs that prepare them for the job market. With a high average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
8%
0%
50%
100%
33%
0%
4★
100%
29%
100%
25%
0%
33%
0%
3★
0%
58%
0%
25%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Staff and school quality

As a new student in UT Social Sciences, I can gladly say that I have felt very welcomed by the faculty since the first day I registered. I must say, everything is very well organized and the staff is very helpful with any questions that you might have. The campus is large with laboratories that ensure a high quality learning process.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close