New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of Tirana - UT vs Albanian University - UFO vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel (4.30)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Tirana - UT: wins 0/6 categories
Albanian University - UFO: wins 1/6 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 5/6 categories
Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT: wins 0/6 categories
Tirana Business University - TBU: wins 0/6 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Best programme: Dentistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.83
3.67
3.67
3.67
Not rated
3.50
Location
Not rated
3.79
4.67
Win
4.33
3.17
Not rated
3.50
Professors
Not rated
3.58
4.50
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
2.67
3.33
4.67
Win
3.17
Not rated
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.96
3.83
4.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
2.25
Value
Not rated
3.33
4.00
4.67
Win
4.33
Not rated
4.25
Accommodation
Not rated
2.96
3.17
4.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff and faculty
  • +Well-organized programs and facilities
  • +Challenging and transformative academic experience
  • +Excellent academic staff & innovative teaching methods
  • +Great infrastructure, modern facilities, and diverse resources
  • +Valuable opportunities for practical application and international exchange
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and quality of teaching
  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Good campus environment and facilities

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality education and dedicated, well-prepared professors
  • +Strong preparation for the job market
  • +Valuable resources and inspiring learning environment
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and complaints are ignored.
  • -Teaching quality is poor with professors using their own books and neglecting important topics.
  • -Facilities are outdated and do not meet modern educational needs.
  • -Concerns about grade inflation and lack of academic rigor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Lack of practical materials and hands-on learning opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

With a nuanced performance across several key areas, this university's strengths lie in its **Location**, receiving a commendable 3.79. **Professors** also scored well at 3.58, alongside **Value** at 3.33. Conversely, the **Internationality** of the institution was rated lowest at 2.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life/Accomodation** were also areas needing improvement, both scoring below 3.

Overall, this institution receives a solid rating of 4 for value. Its strongest areas are Location and Professors, both achieving scores above 4.5. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately well, with scores around 3.3 to 3.8. The weakest aspects appear to be Facilities and Accomodation, with ratings below 3.7.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in the "Value" category with a rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0. Conversely, "Location" and "Internationality" received the lowest scores, both at 3.17. Facilities and Accommodation scored moderately well at 3.67, with Student Life closely behind at 3.5.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its internationality, scoring an impressive 4.5, and offers excellent value with a rating of 4.25. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. Facilities and location are rated moderately at 3.5. Student life emerges as the weakest area, receiving a 2.25, while accommodation sits at a respectable 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Approximately 37.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming faculty, organization, and quality learning. A small percentage (~4.2%) expresses dissatisfaction with grading and complaint procedures. The average rating is 3.42/5.

With an average rating of 3.83/5, ~83% of reviews are positive, praising excellent academic staff, great infrastructure, and valuable opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~17%) expressed concerns about academic integrity.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

Most students (~83%) praise practical learning, good teachers, and facilities. Some (~17%) report disappointment with practical resources.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.25/5, nearly all feedback is positive. Students praise the high quality of education, dedicated professors, and resources that prepare them for the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
8%
33%
0%
17%
0%
50%
4★
100%
29%
50%
100%
67%
0%
25%
3★
0%
58%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
17%
0%
17%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Staff and school quality

As a new student in UT Social Sciences, I can gladly say that I have felt very welcomed by the faculty since the first day I registered. I must say, everything is very well organized and the staff is very helpful with any questions that you might have. The campus is large with laboratories that ensure a high quality learning process.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close