New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of Tirana - UT vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs Albanian University - UFO vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
University of Tirana - UT: wins 0/7 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/7 categories
Albanian University - UFO: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/7 categories
Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT: wins 6/7 categories
Polis University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Bachelor of Applied Information Systems Technology in Network Management
Tirana, Albania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.83
3.67
3.67
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.79
3.67
4.67
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.58
3.67
4.50
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.67
3.33
3.33
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
2.96
3.67
3.83
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.33
3.67
4.00
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.96
3.33
3.17
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff and faculty
  • +Well-organized programs and facilities
  • +Challenging and transformative academic experience
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Excellent academic staff & innovative teaching methods
  • +Great infrastructure, modern facilities, and diverse resources
  • +Valuable opportunities for practical application and international exchange
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Practical and relevant skills
  • +Effective teaching and explanations

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and complaints are ignored.
  • -Teaching quality is poor with professors using their own books and neglecting important topics.
  • -Facilities are outdated and do not meet modern educational needs.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Concerns about grade inflation and lack of academic rigor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not well-implemented.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

With a nuanced performance across several key areas, this university's strengths lie in its **Location**, receiving a commendable 3.79. **Professors** also scored well at 3.58, alongside **Value** at 3.33. Conversely, the **Internationality** of the institution was rated lowest at 2.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life/Accomodation** were also areas needing improvement, both scoring below 3.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

Overall, this institution receives a solid rating of 4 for value. Its strongest areas are Location and Professors, both achieving scores above 4.5. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately well, with scores around 3.3 to 3.8. The weakest aspects appear to be Facilities and Accomodation, with ratings below 3.7.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution garners exceptional marks across most aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. The standout strengths lie in its academic offerings and vibrant campus environment. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving a rating of zero, indicating a critical area requiring improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Approximately 37.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming faculty, organization, and quality learning. A small percentage (~4.2%) expresses dissatisfaction with grading and complaint procedures. The average rating is 3.42/5.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

With an average rating of 3.83/5, ~83% of reviews are positive, praising excellent academic staff, great infrastructure, and valuable opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~17%) expressed concerns about academic integrity.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights strong business information systems education, noting excellent treatment and explanations. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
8%
67%
33%
0%
100%
0%
4★
100%
29%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
58%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
17%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Staff and school quality

As a new student in UT Social Sciences, I can gladly say that I have felt very welcomed by the faculty since the first day I registered. I must say, everything is very well organized and the staff is very helpful with any questions that you might have. The campus is large with laboratories that ensure a high quality learning process.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close