New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/4 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/4 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/4 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 0/4 categories
Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT: wins 3/4 categories
Tirana Business University - TBU: wins 0/4 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Bachelor of Applied Information Systems Technology in Network Management
Best programme: Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
3.67
3.67
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
2.00
3.67
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.67
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
3.33
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.00
3.67
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.67
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
3.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Practical and relevant skills
  • +Effective teaching and explanations

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not well-implemented.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution garners exceptional marks across most aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. The standout strengths lie in its academic offerings and vibrant campus environment. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving a rating of zero, indicating a critical area requiring improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights strong business information systems education, noting excellent treatment and explanations. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
67%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close