New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs The European University of Tirana - UET

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The European University of Tirana - UET (4.30)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 1/7 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 6/7 categories
The European University of Tirana - UET: wins 0/7 categories
Tirana Business University - TBU: wins 0/7 categories
Western Balkans University - WBU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.67
3.67
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
2.00
3.67
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.67
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
3.33
4.67
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
2.00
3.67
4.00
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.67
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
3.33
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Internationality** with a perfect 4.5. Student Life and Value are also strong at 3.75. The main area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating of 3, alongside Facilities at 3.5. Location also scores well at 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professional and approachable professors, exceptional facilities, and personal growth opportunities. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
67%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
100%
25%
0%
0%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close