New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs University of Tirana - UT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University College of Beder

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of arts Tirana - UART (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/7 categories
University of Tirana - UT: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/7 categories
University College of Beder: wins 1/7 categories
University of arts Tirana - UART: wins 5/7 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Sculpture
Best programme: Dentistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
2.83
3.67
4.33
Win
4.00
3.50
Location
Not rated
2.00
3.79
4.33
4.67
5.00
Win
3.50
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.58
4.67
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
2.67
4.67
Win
4.33
4.00
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.00
2.96
4.00
4.67
5.00
Win
2.25
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.33
4.67
4.67
5.00
Win
4.25
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
2.96
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming and helpful staff and faculty
  • +Well-organized programs and facilities
  • +Challenging and transformative academic experience
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and accessible professors
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +Great location and facilities
  • +Supportive teachers and new opportunities
  • +Innovative programs and international experiences
  • +High-quality education and dedicated, well-prepared professors
  • +Strong preparation for the job market
  • +Valuable resources and inspiring learning environment
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and complaints are ignored.
  • -Teaching quality is poor with professors using their own books and neglecting important topics.
  • -Facilities are outdated and do not meet modern educational needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear expectations and communication lead to confusion.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

With a nuanced performance across several key areas, this university's strengths lie in its **Location**, receiving a commendable 3.79. **Professors** also scored well at 3.58, alongside **Value** at 3.33. Conversely, the **Internationality** of the institution was rated lowest at 2.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life/Accomodation** were also areas needing improvement, both scoring below 3.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.

Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are also strong points, rated highly at four out of five. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with its weakest area still being a positive score.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its internationality, scoring an impressive 4.5, and offers excellent value with a rating of 4.25. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. Facilities and location are rated moderately at 3.5. Student life emerges as the weakest area, receiving a 2.25, while accommodation sits at a respectable 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

Approximately 37.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming faculty, organization, and quality learning. A small percentage (~4.2%) expresses dissatisfaction with grading and complaint procedures. The average rating is 3.42/5.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.

The sole review is highly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. The reviewer highlights excellent opportunities for artistic expression, supportive and approachable teachers, and recent innovations like Erasmus programs.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, nearly all feedback is positive. Students praise the high quality of education, dedicated professors, and resources that prepare them for the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
8%
0%
67%
100%
50%
4★
100%
0%
29%
100%
33%
0%
25%
3★
0%
100%
58%
0%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Staff and school quality

As a new student in UT Social Sciences, I can gladly say that I have felt very welcomed by the faculty since the first day I registered. I must say, everything is very well organized and the staff is very helpful with any questions that you might have. The campus is large with laboratories that ensure a high quality learning process.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close