New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT vs University of Tirana - UT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, multicultural education
- +Excellent, experienced professors
- +Strong business programs
Nothing to show
- +Excellent academic staff and quality of education
- +Practical, well-equipped labs and strong technical programs
- +Opportunities for personal growth and a rewarding experience
- +Welcoming and helpful staff and faculty
- +Well-organized programs and facilities
- +Challenging and transformative academic experience
- +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Engaging faculty and staff
- +Good learning environment and opportunities
- +Supportive teachers and new opportunities
- +Innovative programs and international experiences
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, with a lack of consideration for student opinions and an unsupportive staff attitude.
- -Outdated teaching methods and disorganized class structures.
- -Insufficient facilities and equipment, particularly lacking for practical subjects.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and complaints are ignored.
- -Teaching quality is poor with professors using their own books and neglecting important topics.
- -Facilities are outdated and do not meet modern educational needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
- -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear expectations and communication lead to confusion.
Nothing to show
This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.
Nothing to show
This institution presents a mixed review based on student feedback. Its strongest areas include Location, which received a high rating, and Value, indicating good return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be a significant weakness, scoring the lowest. Student Life and Internationality also received comparatively lower marks, while Facilities and Professors fall in the mid-range.
With a nuanced performance across several key areas, this university's strengths lie in its **Location**, receiving a commendable 3.79. **Professors** also scored well at 3.58, alongside **Value** at 3.33. Conversely, the **Internationality** of the institution was rated lowest at 2.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life/Accomodation** were also areas needing improvement, both scoring below 3.
This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.
Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are also strong points, rated highly at four out of five. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with its weakest area still being a positive score.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.43/5, roughly 74% of students offer positive feedback, highlighting strong academic foundations, knowledgeable staff, and practical programs. However, approximately 28.6% of reviews note issues with administration, outdated facilities, and unsupportive staff.
Approximately 37.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming faculty, organization, and quality learning. A small percentage (~4.2%) expresses dissatisfaction with grading and complaint procedures. The average rating is 3.42/5.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.
The sole review is highly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. The reviewer highlights excellent opportunities for artistic expression, supportive and approachable teachers, and recent innovations like Erasmus programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
he Polytechnic University of Tirana provides a solid foundation in technical and engineering fields. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the study programs are practical. However, the administration can sometimes be slow, and more modern facilities would improve the student experience. Overall, I would recommend this university to students who want a strong academic background.
As a new student in UT Social Sciences, I can gladly say that I have felt very welcomed by the faculty since the first day I registered. I must say, everything is very well organized and the staff is very helpful with any questions that you might have. The campus is large with laboratories that ensure a high quality learning process.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show