EU Business School vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs IE University vs Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG vs Universidad de Granada - UGR

Side-by-side comparison from 602 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IE University (4.30)
EU Business School: wins 1/7 categories
ESIC Business & Marketing School: wins 0/7 categories
IE University: wins 1/7 categories
Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de Granada - UGR: wins 1/7 categories
ESADA – Escuela Superior de Arte y Diseño de Andalucía: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad CEU Fernando III - CEU UF3: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
242 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Madrid, Spain
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
155 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Administrative and Accounting Systems
Best programme: Applied Physics
Best programme: Information Systems Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.09
4.34
3.71
3.65
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.71
Win
4.00
4.53
3.80
4.43
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.02
3.82
4.37
4.47
Win
3.63
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.72
3.64
4.76
3.33
4.34
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.21
3.82
4.35
3.21
4.61
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.86
3.64
4.22
Win
3.80
3.94
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.42
3.64
3.78
3.71
4.03
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive staff and strong student-staff relationships
  • +International environment and diverse community
  • +Practical curriculum and interactive classes
  • +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
  • +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
  • +excellent education, facilities, and supportive faculty
  • +encouragement for individual success and career guidance
  • +strong marketing and business programs with practical application
  • +Outstanding faculty support and engaging teaching.
  • +Excellent facilities and resources for learning.
  • +Guidance and opportunities for future career development.
  • +Strong academic quality and professors' expertise
  • +Vibrant city atmosphere, affordability, and cultural richness
  • +Friendly student-teacher relations and good campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
  • +Integrated and close learning environment
  • +Growing campus and accessible transportation
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Educational quality and facilities are subpar.
  • -Extracurricular activities and career support are neglected.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
  • -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
  • -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
  • -Academic deception and low educational standards
  • -Marketing promises not matching reality
  • -Corporate campus lacking traditional college experience
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support cause frustration.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor organization of academic processes, like exams and schedules, causes significant frustration.
  • -A lack of student consideration and empathy from staff and faculty is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.7. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive feedback, averaging above 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating. **Professors** and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores, indicating satisfactory but not outstanding performance in these aspects.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

Remarkably strong performance is evident across most assessed aspects. The university excels particularly in **Internationality**, achieving a rating of 4.76, closely followed by **Location** at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, receiving a score of 3.78. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Facilities also received favorable scores above 4.3.

Academic strengths significantly outshine other aspects, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality represent areas with lower scores. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, while Location and Value fall within a similar mid-range.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its student life, earning a high rating of 4.61. Internationality and location also received very positive marks, reflecting well on the university's global appeal and convenient setting. Conversely, facilities and professors represent the areas with the most room for improvement, indicated by lower scores of 3.65 and 3.63 respectively. Overall, the university presents a favorable picture, particularly regarding its vibrant campus experience.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff and international environments. Around 7% of feedback is negative, with minor concerns about organization and academic challenge.

With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.

~85% of 155 reviews are positive, praising excellent education, facilities, and faculty support. A small percentage (~3.2%) of negative feedback mentions issues with academic standards and program management.

With a 4.07 average rating from 15 reviews, students praise the university's excellent facilities, engaging lecturers, and diverse program offerings. All feedback was positive, with no negative reviews received.

With an average rating of 3.44/5, about 51% of 134 reviews praise solid academics, good atmosphere, and enriching city life. About 14% of feedback notes disorganization and poor administrative/secretarial management.

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.

Rating distribution
5★
26%
31%
55%
7%
12%
0%
0%
4★
45%
55%
29%
93%
40%
0%
100%
3★
21%
13%
13%
0%
34%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
3%
0%
9%
0%
0%
1★
4%
2%
1%
0%
5%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
EU Business School: A Launchpad for Success

I'm thrilled to share my experience at EU Business School. The professors are industry experts who bring real-world insights to the classroom. The classes are interactive and engaging, with a focus on practical applications. I've achieved amazing things, including internships, networking opportunities, and launching my own business project. The campus life is vibrant, with a diverse community of students from around the world. Overall, EU Business School has given me the skills, confidence, and network to pursue my entrepreneurial dreams. I highly recommend it to anyone seeking a business education that truly prepares you for the real worldworld.

Esic university Valencia is the worst university ever 😡

Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡

The teachers, the encouragement they give you,

I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.

Nothing to show

Master in criminology and social intervention with minors

The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close