EU Business School vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs University of Basel - UNIBAS vs Hotel and Tourism Management Institute Switzerland - HTMi vs Geneva School of Diplomacy - GSD
Side-by-side comparison from 337 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Real-world application and engaging teaching methods
- +International mobility and internship opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and alumni support
- +Diverse, inclusive international environment and community events
- +High-quality, relevant academic programs and career preparation
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and accessible faculty
- +Dual degrees and career foundation
- +Reputable programs with practical experience
- +Internship opportunities and networking
- +Experienced and accessible professors from diverse backgrounds.
- +Extensive industry connections and career opportunities.
- +Excellent teaching and campus facilities
- +Strong career prospects and practical learning
- +Good study-life balance
- +Comprehensive sports industry immersion
- +Networking and real-world connections
- +Diverse and international cohort
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content.
- -Chaotic and inconsistent schedules disrupt learning.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Overpriced and low value for money.
- -Unqualified or unmotivated professors.
- -Unreliable administration and accreditation issues.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder educational progress.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is disappointing.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Internationality with a near-perfect 4.93 rating. Student life and facilities also score very strongly, both above 4.7. The university's weakest area, though still good, is its Location, rated at 4.28. Overall, the ratings indicate a well-rounded university with a particular strength in its global appeal and student experience.
This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving a 4.25. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.2, and **Value** stands strong at 4. The university's **Student Life** is its weakest area, with a rating of 3.6, though **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are solid at 3.8.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and global reach. Professors received a perfect score of 5, and its internationality is highly rated at 4.67. The university also scores well in location (4.5) and accommodation (4.33). Facilities and student life both earned a solid 4. Conversely, the value proposition is the weakest area, with a rating of 3.67.
This institution excels in internationality, receiving a score of 4.67. Conversely, its facilities and value for money are areas needing improvement, both scoring a low 2. Professors, location, and student life fall into the mid-range, with accommodation also receiving a moderate rating.
This university garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in its prime **Location** and superb **Accommodations**, both receiving a perfect score. **Internationality** also stands out with a top mark. The weakest area, though still strong, is the **Professors** category with a rating of 4. Overall, the institution presents a highly positive profile, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receiving excellent scores of 4.5, and **Value** rated at a solid 4.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Facilities and professors also scored very well, indicating a high standard of academic and physical resources. Student life is rated positively, though not as high as the top-performing categories. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in student housing offerings. Overall value is rated favorably.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With a ~95% positive rating (4.79/5), reviews highlight excellent opportunities and strong personal growth. No negative feedback was reported among the 61 reviews.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a strong positive sentiment. Students frequently highlight the inclusive international environment and excellent research opportunities. Academic programs and supportive faculty are also recurring positive themes.
University reviews are mixed, with ~67% positive and ~33% negative. Positive feedback highlights career foundation, dual degrees, and practical experience. Some negative comments mention scheduling issues.
With an average rating of 2/5, approximately 67% of reviews are negative. While one positive review highlights great professors and networking opportunities, negative feedback focuses on the program being overpriced and underdelivered, with unaccredited degrees and issues with transcripts.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the top-notch learning environment, amazing teachers, and excellent infrastructure, noting a good study-life balance and strong professional outcomes.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (average 4.67/5) highlights program organization, networking opportunities, and comprehensive coverage of the sports industry. Some mention high living costs in Lausanne.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
Nothing to show
Usually I trust reviews and they have never let me down, until 2023, when I chose to continue the bsc culinary course at this place. I wish someone told me this before my “study” there. First, I couldn’t get my proper classes schedule for 3 weeks. When the schedule finally came, it was chaotic, with daily kitchen duties overlapping with theoretical classes (By the way, I have No complaints about most of the theoretical classes, they were rare for culinary students but to the point and interesting - the only one plus). The kitchen duties were overwhelming, covering 24 days a month, and I almost never had the chance to attend a practical cooking class or even write down a single recipe, as all practical part was under MIT - people who working for HTMI as volunteers to get 1 year Swiss visa. These MIT used to talk with me very badly and always gave the task to clean or bring/peal for them vegetables, they directly told us that culinary students here to work, not enjoy their study. There was no culinary instructor for my course. And almost every event on Friday for students I had to be all day in the kitchen to cook for HTMI and after clean kitchen. I felt like I was working as a servant at the school, preparing meals and performing tasks for the kitchen MIT. The quality of the food was poor, sometimes even totally vegetarian days, and everything was prepared by the students, with the exception of desserts. Desserts were prepared with pastry students, but even pastry chef visits to the main kitchen were rare, and his desserts plating was outdated (like previous century, no one plate this way now in fine dining restaurants. Anyway, at least one teacher whom I sometimes even had to beg to attend his classes instead of “learning” how to clean kitchen and steam rice from MIT) They even taught us to plate dishes in a clock style 🤣) In the event planning class, we were expected to find our sponsors to organize an event as a part of the study, which forced us to seek support from local hotels and supermarkets, couldn’t really do it… They also forgot to give me my iPad in the beginning, when I asked, they say I’m trying to cheat them. I also had to pay my insurance twice. I was hoping on internship, but even that was below then Macdonalds level, i had to prepare sandwiches and salads for hotel staff, HTMI career center that time stoped replying my emails.. The experience was so depressing that I had to take antidepressants to cope with the stress. I strongly recommend that parents of prospective students look elsewhere in Switzerland and avoid these scams. I’m also attaching pictures from our “culinary classes” with MIT and accordingly the same food that was given to the students for 3500 franks per 12 weeks. Thank you for the attention 🙏🏼
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The 15 months at AISTS were truly enlightening. What sets this program apart is its exceptional support system, offering unparalleled professional guidance and prioritizing mental health and wellness.
