EU Business School vs School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs University of Geneva - UNIGE vs Les Roches Global Hospitality Education Switzerland

Side-by-side comparison from 341 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO (5.00)
EU Business School: wins 0/5 categories
School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO: wins 5/5 categories
EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL : wins 0/5 categories
University of Geneva - UNIGE: wins 0/5 categories
Les Roches Global Hospitality Education Switzerland: wins 0/5 categories
Geneva School of Diplomacy - GSD: wins 0/5 categories
International Academy of Sport Management and Technology - AISTS: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Tourism
Best programme: BSc in International Hospitality Management
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Master of Advanced Studies in Sport Management and Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
5.00
Win
4.81
4.22
4.50
2.50
4.58
Location
4.73
5.00
4.29
4.67
5.00
3.00
4.92
Professors
4.04
5.00
Win
4.59
4.44
4.00
3.50
4.58
Internationality
4.72
5.00
4.94
4.78
5.00
4.50
4.83
Student life
4.22
5.00
Win
4.76
4.11
4.50
3.00
4.17
Value
3.87
5.00
Win
4.71
4.78
3.00
2.50
4.50
Accommodation
3.54
5.00
Win
4.62
4.25
4.50
4.00
3.44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Diverse and engaging courses in multiple languages.
  • +Opportunities for international experience and language immersion.
  • +Convenient location with nearby attractions and social activities.
  • +Academic and personal growth opportunities
  • +International experiences and diverse community
  • +Real-world application and strong alumni support
  • +Multicultural environment and diverse colleagues
  • +High-quality faculty with industry experience and strong academic reputation
  • +Practical career preparation and enhanced job opportunities
  • +Practical classes and internships emphasized.
  • +Soft skills and networking opportunities valued.
  • +Experienced and accessible professors from diverse backgrounds.
  • +Extensive industry connections and career opportunities.
  • +Comprehensive sports industry immersion
  • +Networking and real-world connections
  • +Diverse and international cohort
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support systems create a challenging academic environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource availability are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Many students feel there is a lack of career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum or teaching methods are often seen as unengaging or ineffective.
  • -Overpriced and low value for money.
  • -Unqualified or unmotivated professors.
  • -Unreliable administration and accreditation issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from staff is disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all assessed areas, indicating a consistently high-quality experience. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores. This suggests no single area stands out as a particular weakness, with the university demonstrating uniform excellence in its offerings.

Impressively high scores characterize this university's performance. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, boasting a near-perfect rating. Student Life and Facilities also receive excellent marks, closely followed by Value and Accomodation. Professors are well-regarded, though slightly lower than other academic and social aspects. The weakest area, while still strong, is Location.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong international focus and exceptional value, both scoring very high. The institution also excels in the quality of its professors. Among the surveyed aspects, student life received the lowest, though still positive, rating. Facilities and accommodation were also rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded student experience.

This institution boasts outstanding ratings in several key areas, particularly its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also score exceptionally high at 4.5. While **professors** are rated well at 4, the university's **value** is its weakest point, with a score of 3.

This institution excels in internationality, receiving a score of 4.67. Conversely, its facilities and value for money are areas needing improvement, both scoring a low 2. Professors, location, and student life fall into the mid-range, with accommodation also receiving a moderate rating.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Facilities and professors also scored very well, indicating a high standard of academic and physical resources. Student life is rated positively, though not as high as the top-performing categories. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in student housing offerings. Overall value is rated favorably.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight interesting and varied courses, opportunities for international study, and a convenient location. Additional comments mention a small but functional study room and student association events.

With ~100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.79/5, students praise academic and personal development, rewarding experiences, and international opportunities. The program is described as rigorous yet opening doors and offering extensive support.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight multicultural environments, well-organized programs, and knowledgeable professors who are experts in their fields. The curriculum prepares students well for the job market.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~50% of reviews are positive, noting improved soft skills and practical classes. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 2/5, approximately 67% of reviews are negative. While one positive review highlights great professors and networking opportunities, negative feedback focuses on the program being overpriced and underdelivered, with unaccredited degrees and issues with transcripts.

Overwhelmingly positive feedback (average 4.67/5) highlights program organization, networking opportunities, and comprehensive coverage of the sports industry. Some mention high living costs in Lausanne.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
100%
84%
56%
0%
0%
75%
4★
45%
0%
11%
44%
50%
50%
17%
3★
21%
0%
5%
0%
50%
0%
8%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Nothing to show

Learning Hospitality by Living it

Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.

Challenging but worth it

It is true that a diploma from a Swiss university isn't easy to get, but it is totally profitable. First, this program gives us opportunities to meet prestigious Swiss businessmen and businesswomen. Plus our professors are well-known and are the best in their domain. With a diploma from UNIGE, we have a career assured, especially if we want to work in Switzerland (one of the countries with the highest wages), but also internationally. Our university is located in the international city of Geneva, we can enjoy the little but pleasant student life with students from all around the world.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Support and Growth

The 15 months at AISTS were truly enlightening. What sets this program apart is its exceptional support system, offering unparalleled professional guidance and prioritizing mental health and wellness.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close