EU Business School vs School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO vs Zurich Institute of Business Education vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs Les Roches Global Hospitality Education Switzerland
Side-by-side comparison from 333 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Diverse and engaging courses in multiple languages.
- +Opportunities for international experience and language immersion.
- +Convenient location with nearby attractions and social activities.
- +Passionate professors and rich course offerings
- +Opportunities for knowledge growth in chosen fields
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +International experiences and diverse community
- +Real-world application and strong alumni support
- +Practical classes and internships emphasized.
- +Soft skills and networking opportunities valued.
- +Experienced and accessible professors from diverse backgrounds.
- +Extensive industry connections and career opportunities.
- +Comprehensive sports industry immersion
- +Networking and real-world connections
- +Diverse and international cohort
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support systems create a challenging academic environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource availability are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum or teaching methods are often seen as unengaging or ineffective.
- -Overpriced and low value for money.
- -Unqualified or unmotivated professors.
- -Unreliable administration and accreditation issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is disappointing.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all assessed areas, indicating a consistently high-quality experience. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores. This suggests no single area stands out as a particular weakness, with the university demonstrating uniform excellence in its offerings.
This institution exhibits a strong performance across several key areas, with high ratings for its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all scoring a 4. Notably, student life received a significantly lower score of 0, indicating it as a considerable area for improvement.
Impressively high scores characterize this university's performance. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, boasting a near-perfect rating. Student Life and Facilities also receive excellent marks, closely followed by Value and Accomodation. Professors are well-regarded, though slightly lower than other academic and social aspects. The weakest area, while still strong, is Location.
This institution boasts outstanding ratings in several key areas, particularly its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also score exceptionally high at 4.5. While **professors** are rated well at 4, the university's **value** is its weakest point, with a score of 3.
This institution excels in internationality, receiving a score of 4.67. Conversely, its facilities and value for money are areas needing improvement, both scoring a low 2. Professors, location, and student life fall into the mid-range, with accommodation also receiving a moderate rating.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Facilities and professors also scored very well, indicating a high standard of academic and physical resources. Student life is rated positively, though not as high as the top-performing categories. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in student housing offerings. Overall value is rated favorably.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight interesting and varied courses, opportunities for international study, and a convenient location. Additional comments mention a small but functional study room and student association events.
With one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. Positive feedback highlights excellent courses and knowledgeable, passionate professors. A minor challenge noted is the workload relative to credits.
With ~100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.79/5, students praise academic and personal development, rewarding experiences, and international opportunities. The program is described as rigorous yet opening doors and offering extensive support.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~50% of reviews are positive, noting improved soft skills and practical classes. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 2/5, approximately 67% of reviews are negative. While one positive review highlights great professors and networking opportunities, negative feedback focuses on the program being overpriced and underdelivered, with unaccredited degrees and issues with transcripts.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (average 4.67/5) highlights program organization, networking opportunities, and comprehensive coverage of the sports industry. Some mention high living costs in Lausanne.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The 15 months at AISTS were truly enlightening. What sets this program apart is its exceptional support system, offering unparalleled professional guidance and prioritizing mental health and wellness.
