Escuela Superior De Comunicación, Imagen y Sonido - CEV vs Parul University - PU vs Khmelnytskyi National University - KhNU vs Dr. José Matías Delgado University - UJMD vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced, industry-connected faculty
- +Practical, real-world learning environment
- +Supportive and highly qualified faculty
- +Practical learning opportunities and career support
- +Diverse and global student community
- +In-depth study of specialized subjects, including foreign languages.
- +Comprehensive education with hands-on professional practices
- +Essential knowledge and skills for successful careers
- +In-depth understanding and real-world experience
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Experiential learning and knowledgeable facilitators
- +Dynamic programs for professional development
- +Supportive peer learning environment
- +Welcoming international student support
- +Excellent academic platforms, enabling continuity
- -Administrative and management issues, including ignored complaints and poor organization.
- -Lack of effective safety measures and crowded conditions.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support is a recurring theme.
- -Administrative and management issues are concerning.
- -Outdated facilities are a problem.
- -A perceived lack of future prospects and academic integrity is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support causes significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and outdated curriculum are persistent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support.
This university presents a mixed profile, with its **facilities** standing out as a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. In contrast, its **professors** and **location** are its strongest aspects, both scoring a solid 3. Areas such as student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value fall in the mid-range, indicating moderate satisfaction across these crucial university experiences.
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in **Internationality**, earning a rating of 4.07. **Student Life** also ranks highly at 3.86. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest score at 3.08, indicating it as the weakest area. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally consistent, though not outstanding, performance across these metrics.
This institution receives uniform ratings of 1 across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas to highlight, as all aspects are rated equally low. The provided scores suggest a consistent lack of satisfaction across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its prime location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. However, internationality stands out as a weaker area, scoring lower than other assessed aspects.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Demonstrating exceptional strengths, the university received perfect scores for value and notably high ratings for facilities, location, and student life. Professors and accommodation received solid scores, falling just below the top tier. Internationality also scored well, indicating a diverse and welcoming environment.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodations**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. These aspects likely contribute significantly to a positive student experience. Conversely, the **Location** received a lower rating of 3, indicating it may not be as advantageous as other aspects. Professors are rated well at 4, suggesting a generally strong academic staff.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative reviews. Positive comments highlight a prime location and valuable industry connections, while negative feedback points to concerns with security and student management.
The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, practical learning opportunities, and a diverse student community. Administration processes and interdepartmental communication are minor areas for improvement.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight strong language programs and specialized subjects, while negative reviews point to a lack of future prospects, absent professors, and building conditions.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a highly positive experience (~50% positive). Students praise comprehensive education, essential skills, and valuable real-world experience through hands-on practices.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 based on 3 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students praise the experiential learning, helpful facilitators, and solid knowledge acquisition. Some mention a need for more residences and dining facilities.
With one review, this university receives an average of 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights excellent treatment of international students and amazing academic platforms, even during COVID-19. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Dr. José Matías Delgado University proved to be an exceptional choice for my professional studies. The comprehensive education I received equipped me with the essential knowledge and skills required for a successful career. The curriculum was enhanced by hands-on professional practices, which provided me with valuable real-world experience across various fields. This practical approach facilitated the development of a significant and in-depth understanding of the subjects, thoroughly preparing me for the professional world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show