University of Insubria - UNINSUBRIA vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Università degli Studi della Tuscia vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, competent professors and good teaching
- +Varied academic proposals and internship opportunities
- +Positive learning environment and valuable student experiences
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
- +Strong industry connections and practical business education
- +International environment and balanced daily life
- +Excellent and varied food options
- +Engaging professors and supportive peer relationships
- +Rich historical environment and heritage
- +Transformative learning experiences
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with an exceptional rating for Professors (4.45). Location (4.2) and Student Life (3.975) also garnered positive feedback. However, Internationality stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower score (2.925). Facilities and Value are rated moderately well, while Accomodation scores are a bit lower.
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.
A well-rounded academic institution, this university excels in attracting and retaining top-tier faculty, boasting a perfect score for professors. Its prime location also earns a full five stars. However, areas for improvement are evident, particularly in accommodation, which received a low rating of two. While student life and facilities are rated positively at four, value for money is considered average at three. Internationality scores a respectable four.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~80% of feedback is positive. Students highlight competent professors, good teaching, and varied program offerings, including internships. Some mention bureaucracy as a minor concern.
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university receives overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students highlight inspiring professors and meaningful group projects.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
Nothing to show
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
